My latest take on the L-Plates fiasco
October 30, 2007 — sharonaI’m drawn to quoting that hero of Sunday evening RTÉ programming, Miley Byrne - “Well hOly GOD”
It’s sad to see such a public outpouring of stupidity as per last weekend, and sadder still to see that we as a nation seem to be proud of this particular brand of stupidity. Minister for Transport [finally] announces vaguely reasonable driver licensing regulations. Country goes mad.
There are a lot of issues involved - not least the fact that enforcement of the laws as they stood at midnight yesterday would hve solved half the problems - but is that really any excuse for the mayhem? Up until the point where he spectacularly back-tracked (foot? bullet? anyone?) the only major change announced was that drivers on their second provisional, better known as “those who have been driving 2 years and still not passed a test”, would now also have to be accompanied by a qualified driver. Cue outpouring of rage from law-breakers all over the country, on their 4th provisional, who will now not be able to drive their young children to school, and who feel hard done by because they know they wouldn’t be able to pass a test at this stage.
I know I’ve mentioned all this before, but just to be clear:
- Last week it was equally illegal to drive unaccompanied on your 1st, 3rd or subsequent provisional licence.
- If you wouldn’t pass a test, you shouldn’t be on the road anyway.
- If you wouldn’t pass a test, because you’re a bad/dangerous/incompetent driver, how dare you endanger your child(ren) and everyone else nearby on a daily basis
- In accordance with numbers 1-3 above, you don’t deserve sympathy, you should be arrested!!
The extent of the uproar has shocked even me.
I’ll admit many of the complaints, and particularly those being broadcast in the media, have been from those on 2nd provisionals - probably because intelligent media types realise that the rest of them don’t deserver (and shouldn’t be given) either sympathy or the proverbial ear of the nation.
One story in particular has stuck in my head - a 30 something year-old guy who complained that he now wouldn’t be able to drive to work on Tuesday, and as a solution openly admitted that he was going to happily flout the law. In that blissfully typical way we Irish have, we seem to applaud this kind of scheduled law-breaking.
Is it just me or should he be slapped in the face and not on the back?
This is a very simple issue when it comes down to it. That man has not earned the right to drive (and again, let me emphasise, it is a right, not a privilege). Nor does he have squatters rights on the road. The fact that he could, without any fear of retribution, declare that he would be breaking multiple laws at 8:30am this morning, and probably announce his route, knowing well that he would get away with it, says it all.
Seven people died on the roads this bank holiday weekend. The number injured was as ever not as neat a statistic so we don’t hear it. I imagine those seven (and more) families are glad that something substantial is finally being done to deal with the epidemic of murder on our roads. This despite the fact that for their family it is too late. For too many families, it is far too late.
Noel Dempsey may have done himself no favours by changing his mind once bullied into a corner, but in those few hours before he distracted everyone, where was the celebration? Where were the various state, semi-state, support, victims, whatever-organisations saying “well done, at last, thank whoever-you-thank”. Where was Bertie-the-great supporting it so the mindless masses who support him would row in behind it?
Just once I’d like to see a brave decision being made, stuck to, and fully supported by this ever-dithering excuse for a government…